Why Do Scientists Tend To Prefer PDF Documents Over Html When Reading?

Why do scientists tend to prefer PDF documents over HTML when reading scientific journals? And what would they want from the HTML to make it more compelling?

Will HTML as a technology replace PDF? No. However we will see web based platforms replace the PDF. PDF’s were made by How To Alter A Pdf.online as an easy way to present documents and encapsulated all the necessary assets (text, images, fonts etc..) required to accurately reproduce the document on any hardware or OS. This has worked great since it’s inception in the 1900’s but as technology has evolved PDF’s haven’t really changed much. Up until the advent of mobile computing PDF’s have worked great as a way to send and receive digital documents that can be easily printed. However mobile and PDF’s don’t play too well together. PDF’s require the entire document to be downloaded before being viewed, which is data transfer intensive and can be super slow over mobile connections. T don’t preview well on small mobile phone screens and unlike HTML web based content t aren’t dynamic (ie content can’t be re-organized on the fly to fit the screen size). We’re already seeing web platforms erode PDF usage. Orangedox | Digital Publishing for Creators will convert your PDF’s into HTML format on the fly for mobile friendly viewing